Cookie Settings

Technology: One world, two systems

Supply chains under stress

In recent years, international supply chains have come under mounting pressure. Even before COVID-19, a growing number of companies and countries were already looking to diversify away from a perceived excess dependence on China, borne from rising Chinese labor costs paired with escalating trade tensions with the United States.

As Sino-US rivalry has extended from trade to technology, we’re seeing the development of “one world, two systems” in which geopolitical considerations play an increasingly dominant role in driving technology and trade patterns. This is already evident when it comes to the online giants—US companies regarded as household names such as Google, Amazon and Facebook do not have much, if any, presence in China’s online ecosystem.

The global pandemic has driven demand for greater resilience and security of supply chains, further reinforcing this structural shift. Global supply chains are starting to fracture, which poses challenges but also opportunities for those  companies able to effectively navigate this changing environment.

Adapting to structural change

In our view, the sheer size and efficiency of China’s manufacturing sector will ensure it remains a crucial part of global supply chains for years to come. It is those companies integral to global technology hardware production—supplying key products to both China and the United States—that may have to be most adaptive. As active, engaged investors, we identify three characteristics that may facilitate success:

  • Intellectual Property: Semiconductor foundries benefit from the structural themes driving global demand for computing power, rather than being dependent on the fortunes of specific companies—whether Chinese or American. Technological leadership enables a virtuous cycle of growing market share that funds research and development and increased capital expenditures.
  • Improving Competitive Dynamics: US tariffs and sanctions have negatively impacted the competitiveness of certain Chinese technology companies, entailing opportunities for others to grow international market share in smartphones and fifth-generation (5G) network equipment.
  • Global Diversification: As supply chains fragment, those companies with pre-existing worldwide production capabilities will likely demonstrate greater resilience and adaptability.

Reverse globalisation

Since China’s entry to the World Trade Organization in 2001, its share of global manufacturing has steadily increased as the country became the “world’s factory,” integral to global supply chains. Over the last two decades, however, China’s labor costs have steadily risen, while in more recent years geopolitical tensions with the United States have increased considerably. An initial trade war has broadened into a “tech war” involving tariffs, sanctions and export controls, increasing the attractiveness of alternative manufacturing locations.

This structural trend has been accelerated by COVID-19: the pandemic exposed how vulnerable global supply chains are to disruption, with companies in over 80% of global sectors impacted.* China and the United States are competing for leadership in technology, while also seeking improved security in the production and supply of goods essential to national security. We expect this to drive development of dual supply chains, which we characterize as “one world, two systems.”

Breaking up is hard to do

What comes next depends on how well companies adapt to and manage the transition of supply chain operations in whole or in part. Building another production cluster isn’t cheap—it is estimated that to relocate all foreign manufacturing within China not intended for the domestic market would cost an initial US$1 trillion, while also reducing ongoing company efficiency.∧

Economies of scale would be harder to achieve—strong balance sheets and free cash flow generation are critical, while government incentives are also important. In our view, companies able to achieve success amid such global upheaval require
considerable resilience—with three attributes outlined below.

  • Intellectual Property Leadership

The production of a semiconductor requires two distinct phases: design and fabrication. Historically many chip designers outsourced production to foundries with specialized manufacturing prowess and lower costs. The complexity of fabrication has increased as semiconductor chips have shrunk—with process nodes measured in nanometers (nm)— which is to say that computing power, reliability and energy consumption have improved for a given size.
Over time ever fewer companies have been able to progress to the next level of technology, with market share increasingly concentrated in companies with superior intellectual property. With few remaining “integrated” semiconductor companies producing the chips they design, these companies have entailed the use of third-party foundries, representing a significant milestone in terms of competition and market share for those contracted. Leading Asia-based foundries have become essential to global supply chains—whether producing chips for multinational companies or those integrated semiconductor companies.
While tighter US export controls cause near-term disruption—for example, limiting chip supplies to Chinese companies—this has limited impact longer term. The end consumer demand for smartphones, and their semiconductors, does not change, only the client mix. With increased market concentration leading foundries have the financial resources to expand internationally, bringing production closer to key markets amid changing global supply dynamics.

  • Improving Competitive Dynamics

Amid increased distrust and rivalry, leading Chinese technology companies are bearing the brunt of sanctions and suspicion, reducing their ability to compete internationally. This is evident through companies choosing to shift manufacturing intended for export out of China. A prominent global company’s last smartphone factory in China shut its doors in 2019, citing intensifying domestic competition. The conglomerate shifted production to a purpose-built 35-acre facility in Noida, India, which is expected to create 15,000 jobs and raise domestic smartphone production capacity from 67 million to 120 million. The company already has extensive local manufacturing capabilities globally—including Brazil, Vietnam, Indonesia and in its home market. US restrictions on Chinese companies could block access to US technology, including smartphone software as well as advanced semiconductors—both integral to the company’s smartphones, severely limiting their appeal to international consumers. Similarly in India, rising tensions with China have resulted in the US government imposing bans on numerous Chinese mobile apps. The move has affected the leading smartphone brand in India, which pre-installs a number of these on its phones. 5G networks is another industry seeing widespread disruption as a result of national security concerns. As countries become closely aligned with the United States, from India to the United Kingdom, they could phase out Chinese equipment from their 5G infrastructure. We see some growth potential as there have been multiple billion-dollar 5G deals in the United States alone during 2020.

  • Global Diversification

Companies with experience building and managing worldwide manufacturing networks are likely to be more adaptive in responding to increased demands for localized production. A Taiwanese multinational electronics contract manufacturer based in New Taipei City has long relied on a worldwide production network, across roughly 70 sites in 13 countries. Illustrating “one world, two systems,” the company recently announced plans to create two distinct supply chains, since “(China’s) days as the world’s factory are done.”

Approximately 80% of its client base is non-Chinese and thus the current 30% of production outside of China is set to rise substantially. Concurrently, the company is facing pressure on market share in the Chinese domestic market, demonstrating the complex interplay of competitive forces across dual supply chains.
China’s efforts to ensure its own security of supply, with greater local production of goods for the domestic market by Chinese companies, have resulted in substantial share price gains of potential beneficiaries, across various technology sub-sectors. For example, a Chinese company that manufactures smartphone parts, has now risen to be a respected domestic competitor to a prominent Taiwanese smartphone part manufacturer. The company enjoys a greater market capitalization despite overall revenues and profits being substantially lower than key international competitors,3 suggesting very high market expectations for future earnings. While China’s domestic market is massive, the potential for such competitors to successfully expand in scale outside of China remains a critical component of their long-term sustainability and is yet unproven.

Opportunity and uncertainty

The COVID-19 pandemic has sharply highlighted the fragility of complex global supply chains, adding impetus to the re-shoring and localization of production essential to national security. We do not expect this environment to be meaningfully altered by the outcome of the US elections, though rhetoric could escalate. We are seeing tectonic shifts taking place in the structure of global trade and manufacturing in technology. We believe there are growth and investment opportunities for many companies that can adapt to and overcome challenges.

Read more articles like this on our insights page


* Source: BofA Global Research, July 2020.

∧ Ibid

∨ Nikkei, Luxshare grows into China’s iPhone champion with help from Apple, August 14, 2020


About the author

Chetan Sehgal, CFA, Executive Vice President, Templeton Asset Management Ltd

Chetan Sehgal is an executive vice president and the Director of Global Emerging Markets/ Small Cap Strategies for the Templeton Emerging Markets Group. In this capacity, he is responsible for strengthening the overall Global Emerging Markets and Small Cap strategies, providing guidance and thought leadership, coordinating appropriate resources and coverage, and leveraging the group's expertise to add value across products within the strategies. Prior to joining Franklin Templeton in 1995, Mr. Sehgal was a senior ratings analyst for the Credit Rating Information Services of India, Ltd.


All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments; investments in emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors. To the extent a strategy focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investment from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments. The technology industry can be significantly affected by obsolescence of existing technology, short product cycles, falling prices and profits, competition from new market entrants as well as general economic conditions. Smaller and newer companies can be particularly sensitive to changing economic conditions. Their growth prospects are less certain than those of larger, more established companies, and they can be volatile.
The companies and case studies shown herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The opinions are intended solely to provide insight into how securities are analyzed. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio. Factual statements are taken from sources considered reliable, but have not been independently verified for completeness or accuracy. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or as an offer for any particular security. Past performance does not guarantee future results.


IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.
Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verifi ed, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.
Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com—Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.


The information, materials or opinions contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice and should not be relied on treated as a substitute for specific advice of any kind.

We make no warranties, representatives or undertakings about any of the content of this website (including without limitation any representations as to the quality, accuracy, completeness or fitness of any particular purpose of such content, or in relation to any content of articles provided by third parties and displayed on this website or any website referred to or accessed by hyperlinks through this website.

Although we make reasonable efforts to update the information on this site, we make no representation warranties or guarantees whether express or implied that the content on our site is accurate complete or up to date.

Be the first to hear news and insights from Embark Group

Our emails are designed to be topical and engaging, however if you don’t like what we send, you can unsubscribe at any time. We promise never to pass your details on to a third party.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.